Mir Farooq Ali, Robert Capra, Nathan Conklin, Chad Wingrave, Craig Ganoe, Wendy Schafer, Miranda Capra, Tracy Lewis
Not present: Pankaj Poddar, Vijay Hanumolu
Meetings:
Our next meeting will be February 1st, 2001.
Objective:
This meeting was designed to discuss status of several pending issues.
Committee Reports
Everyone - Please remember to remind the faculty
to invite you to the
committee meetings for your committee.
GPC - Tracy
Qualifying Exam
The current grading of the qualifying exam
has changed to a format
of 3 graders. The scores are assigned
and an average is taken. The
score is then reviewed by the GPC.
The GPC is reviewing the following three options for the Qual:
1) Open book + less restrictive time
Department supplied
laptops to help with the write-up
Also, a points system
is to be established to determine if the
student
is "qualified". This system is based on three
sections:
GPA, Research, and Qualifying Exam. In each section
the student
will be rated on a scale from 0-3.
In GPA:
0 - 4th
quartile GPA of all CS graduate students
1 - 3rd
quartile GPA of all CS graduate students
2 - 2nd
quartile GPA of all CS graduate students
3 - 1st
quartile GPA of all CS graduate students
In Research:
0 - No demonstrative
behavior towards research
1 - Demonstrates
research initiative by either finding an
advisor
2 - Demonstrates
research ability in the form of completing
a research project, independent study, or RA
3 - Demonstrates
research ability in the form of completing a
research paper and having it published.
In Qualifier:
0 - Fails
the qual at all levels
1 - Passes
the qual at Masters, but fails at PhD
2 - Passes
the qual at PhD
3 - Performs
exceptionally well on the qual
A student would have
to have a total combined score of six (6) in
order to have passed
the qualifying milestone.
2) Student must receive an A or A- in 7 of 11 core courses.
3) Student must complete a smaller set
of core courses
Student must read about
20 papers assigned by advisor and take
either an oral or written
exam.
The graduate council will send around a
note soliciting feedback.
Tracy will present the feedback to Dr.
Shaffer.
Tracy will also find out when the next
faculty meeting is.
We need to inform all graduate students
to solicit feedback.
CRC - Farooq
Dr. Erich is the head of the CRC now.
Farooq will voice our problems with administration
of CSGRAD at the
next CRC meeting
Chad and Farooq are going to the Friday
3:00 CRC meeting
Space allocations
Tracy will make changes to the applications to
stream line the
process. These changes have been approved.
Applications will go out
immediately. They are due back by Friday.
Assignments will be made
by Monday. All lockers will be reassigned.
Super Friends
To battle with the continued need of administration
flexibility, we a
considering having a group of "super friends"
who share some
priveledges to the CSGRAD machine. Pete,
Vijay, Jason, and Nathan
are being considered for the position.
Rob will work on a list of
needs that we have for CSGRAD. They will
be something like:
- priveledge to clear tmp
- priveledge to reboot the machine
- priveledge to clear some of /var/spool
Constitution
Nathan is working on his first pass at the Constitution.
He has
requested that everyone review the description
of their position.
Everyone should update (re-write or create) a
description for the
position. They should also document contact
information needed for
attending meetings and becoming part of the committee.
The document will move from a LaTeX version to
a solely HTML version.
There will also be a separation of the document
into two documents.
One will remain the constitution - a static artifact
of the bylaws.
The other will become a dynamic artifact that
discusses procedures and
processes that may/will change. This dynamic
portion will contain the
position descriptions and event descriptions.
Social Events
Social events on the calendar include:
- Ethnic dinner (Bob offered to host)
- Ice Skating
- Movie night (Jason showed interest)
- Virginia Trek Scavenger Hunt
Open Meetings
We are planning to hold our first open meeting
on either Febraury 5th
or 6th. This date should be better finalized
and should be published
for all the graduate students. At this
meeting we will request
feedback for where the students concerns are
and what the graduate
council can do to work towards these concerns.
We also want to make
it known that all meetings are open.
Submitted by: Nathan Conklin January 22, 2001